Last Sunday was Father’s Day — a day for celebrating the parent that goes largely unnoticed and under-appreciated the rest of the year.
Dads are under-appreciated partly because our society is no longer conditioned to hold fathers in high esteem.
Fathers have long been a favorite target of television sitcoms, where the vast majority of them are depicted as inept, irrelevant idiots more deserving of ridicule than respect.
For decades, fathers have been marginalized and emasculated and treated as if they have nothing of value to contribute to their family’s life beyond its economic support (if that).
And to the degree that life imitates art, men must fight against these stereotypes, not only in contemporary culture, but sometimes even in their own homes.
But another reason dads go unnoticed and under-appreciated is because so many of them are absentee fathers — they’re seldom around to attract any attention or appreciation.
This may be due to death, divorce, abandonment, or career choice; regardless of the cause, their absence comes at a high cost to the children they’ve left behind.
Despite what the liberal media might lead us to believe, fathers play a vital, irreplaceable role in the development of their children. Despite the divorce lawyers’ assurances that “kids are resilient and will quickly adjust to life without you,” the children rarely (if ever) escape such an ordeal unscathed. Most will carry scars from their parents’ split for the rest of their lives.
And while having a loving, engaged father living in your home, eating at your table, and taking interest in your life is not essential to success, studies show that paternal involvement makes such success a lot more probable.
According to a fascinating new book by Paul Raeburn, Do Fathers Matter?: What Science Is Telling Us About the Parent We’ve Overlooked, the general consensus, at least in the research community, is that fathers do matter. They matter a lot.
Beginning before conception and moving through pregnancy, delivery, infancy, children, teens, and all the way to fathering in old age, Raeburn covers cutting-edge research that gives insight into how fathers shape their children, for better or worse.
The bottom line? When fathers are involved, everybody fares better:
The children benefit.
- Infants respond most positively to the way their father plays with them, which tends to be more physical and idiosyncratic than their mother’s play. (p. 126) Furthermore, children of fathers who engaged in the most physical and enjoyable play were less aggressive, more competent, and better liked by their peers. (p. 152)
- Fathers have a huge impact on their children’s language development, even more so than mothers and irrespective of the mother’s education level or how she speaks to the children. (p. 145)
- Children with fathers who are supportive and encouraging show a boost in intellectual development. (p. 147)
- They also do better in school, both academically and socially: Paternal encouragement is associated with better relationships between children and their school teachers, as well as better behavior and social skills. (p. 150)
- Engaged, attentive fathering has been linked to higher IQs in children, lower risk of smoking as teens, and even lower incidence of depression and psychological ailments decades later. (p. 151)
- Sadly, there appears to be a robust association between father absence — both physical and psychological — and accelerated reproductive development in daughters, increased sexual risk taking, and higher incidence of teen pregnancy and STD infection. (pp. 160-164)
The wives benefit.
- When fathers are present in the delivery room, mothers are less likely to cry or to require pain medication. (p.111)
- Supportive parenting on the part of fathers has been shown to improve the behavior of mothers toward their children. When he’s more loving and attentive, she is, too. (p. 147)
- When couples forge a strong alliance in parenting, their marriage is strengthened, as well. (p. 85)
The fathers themselves benefit.
- Fathers who are involved with their children have a reduced incidence of illness and mortality. (p. 138)
- Men who devote more time to fatherhood also have higher self-esteem and lower parental stress. (pp. 123-124)
- Interestingly, low testosterone is not only associated with increased longevity, but also with better, more attentive fathering (pp. 74-75) — so why does our society push supplemental testosterone on middle-aged men as if it were candy?
And those findings are just the tip of the iceberg. I’d encourage you to read Do Fathers Matter? to get the details on the benefits mentioned above and to discover a myriad of others.
So what does all that mean for us? How should these studies affect our day-to-day lives?
For me — and these are my thoughts, not the author’s — this book serves as just one more reminder of how vitally important it is that I nurture my marriage. The next generation is counting on it!
No matter how much others would like us to believe that marriages are just contracts of convenience that can be dissolved without consequence, that simply isn’t true. When Mom and Dad go separate ways, the children are always affected.
No matter how often society argues that what consenting adults do in private should be of no concern to anybody else, their behavior does affect the community around them — especially the children.
And no matter how emphatically our culture insists that one definition of “family” is just as good as the next, the preponderance of research indicates there is an optimal design, at least when it comes to rearing offspring: that of a father and a mother firmly committed to one another and jointly and lovingly involved in the lives of their children.
I am constantly impressed with the balanced, insightful, non-judgmental yet truth-seeking information you give on this blog — especially coming from a *conservative white homeschooling **Christian *…if more of “us” (I am in all of those categories, too — or will be when I start homeschooling in a few years Godwilling) decided to approach issues this way, people on the “other side” wouldn’t have as much reason to hold anything against – and we would probably achieve a lot more solidarity.
That last paragraph: “And no matter how emphatically our culture insists that one definition of ‘family’ is just as good as the next, the preponderance of research indicates there is an optimal design, at least when it comes to rearing offspring” — said better than any of the pastors or Christian leaders I have heard in the last few days regarding why the Supreme Court’s latest decision is so damaging to our futures.
*an optimal design* — it’s really about that, isn’t it? God created us to thrive, to love him and each other with our whole hearts. We messed up when we sinned. But his optimal design remains.
Anyway — I’m off on a tangent now. I just wanted to say thank you for this balanced and healthy perspective!
Jennifer Flanders says
Thanks for your kind words, MJ. I appreciate the encouragement.
Timely and spot-on! Thank you so much for speaking the truth so boldly!!